("Loon" meaning not a crazy person, but the beloved water bird)
Thoughts on various things from my perspective as a Latter-Day Saint, an idealist, and a generally curious person
A thoughtful post. It's odd how sayings tend to get attributed to famous people -- Mark Twain, Bill Cosby, Einstein ... -- and most of us never bother to check.
This is certainly a cynical post for a self-described idealist! "pure bunk" is way too harsh. I cannot agree that the life of an exemplary person must only attract either uncritical praise or hostility. Sure, it happens, and often enough to be the usual. But others are truly inspired. I daresay Mandela himself did not spring from a rock. Not everyone who is inspired to be good eventually comes to your attention. To paraphrase ... who? Thoreau? Emerson? Shakespeare? Twain? Will Rogers? Freud? ... "Some significant number of people lead lives of quiet admiration."
@Richard: Do you think checking has become ever so much more difficult with the internet? Not physically harder but reliably harder. Now we not only have to find the citation, but also judge its reliability. What with the appearance of authority and the ease of propagation, how does one decide when to stop collecting attributions and pick one?
To choose among Josh Billings, Artemus Ward, and Mark Twain (all of them pseudonyms, on top of it) one almost has to time travel to New England.
At least Bartlett's had dedicated editors, but they haven't kept up.
Alignment: Neutral Good A neutral good character does the best that a good person can do. He is devoted to helping others. He works with kings and magistrates but does not feel beholden to them. Neutral good is the best alignment you can be because it means doing what is good without bias for or against order. However, neutral good can be a dangerous alignment when it advances mediocrity by limiting the actions of the truly capable.
Race: Humans are the most adaptable of the common races. Short generations and a penchant for migration and conquest have made them physically diverse as well. Humans are often unorthodox in their dress, sporting unusual hairstyles, fanciful clothes, tattoos, and the like.
Class: Rangers are skilled stalkers and hunters who make their home in the woods. Their martial skill is nearly the equal of the fighter, but they lack the latter's dedication to the craft of fighting. Instead, the ranger focuses his skills and training on a specific enemy a type of creature he bears a vengeful grudge against and hunts above all others. Rangers often accept the role of protector, aiding those who live in or travel through the woods. His skills allow him to move quietly and stick to the shadows, especially in natural settings, and he also has special knowledge of certain types of creatures. Finally, an experienced ranger has such a tie to nature that he can actually draw on natural power to cast divine spells, much as a druid does, and like a druid he is often accompanied by animal companions. A ranger's Wisdom score should be high, as this determines the maximum spell level that he can cast.
4 comments:
A thoughtful post. It's odd how sayings tend to get attributed to famous people -- Mark Twain, Bill Cosby, Einstein ... -- and most of us never bother to check.
This is certainly a cynical post for a self-described idealist! "pure bunk" is way too harsh. I cannot agree that the life of an exemplary person must only attract either uncritical praise or hostility. Sure, it happens, and often enough to be the usual. But others are truly inspired. I daresay Mandela himself did not spring from a rock. Not everyone who is inspired to be good eventually comes to your attention. To paraphrase ... who? Thoreau? Emerson? Shakespeare? Twain? Will Rogers? Freud? ... "Some significant number of people lead lives of quiet admiration."
@Richard: Do you think checking has become ever so much more difficult with the internet? Not physically harder but reliably harder. Now we not only have to find the citation, but also judge its reliability. What with the appearance of authority and the ease of propagation, how does one decide when to stop collecting attributions and pick one?
To choose among Josh Billings, Artemus Ward, and Mark Twain (all of them pseudonyms, on top of it) one almost has to time travel to New England.
At least Bartlett's had dedicated editors, but they haven't kept up.
Well designed,interesting and entertaining. Keep it up.
Post a Comment